Comments on: “Free” Energy – The Infinite Battery

By: tecknowfreak

tecknowfreak — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:47:27 +0000

Ah look at all the stuff on self sustained reaction they all deal with at least all that i find with splitting atoms and i have 2 diff setups that dont split any atoms in amy form as i can find so when i have my plastic to oil setup running once to temp i turn off my starting heat source? than use the left over gas byproduct to keep the heat and temp running than all i do is just feed in plastic by all physics i find on self sustaining setups all split atoms unless u know of some i dont?

By: DementedLemon486

DementedLemon486 — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:51:08 +0000

Strictly speaking, this isn’t free energy. There is a lot of it, but more energy is required by the radio companies to transmit it than it is to receive it, as the waves are scattered. It? means free energy for you, but not for the power company.

By: CommanderMethos

CommanderMethos — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:15:33 +0000

none of that breaks the? laws of physics. youve just described a thermic breakdown of plastic into its constituent parts which is then seperated out into oil. breaking down compounds like plastic is fairly easy to do. also you wont detect any radiation it gives off because there would be very little and most likley of the alpha and beta varietys since none of the input nor output is unstable.

By: MrJimSlim1

MrJimSlim1 — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:28:54 +0000

The idea? is good but I think you would need a massive antenna to produce a few nW..explaining the properties of diodes will not overcome this.Myth busted.

By: raymondo162

raymondo162 — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:44:21 +0000

0:22 lost? me mate. ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz

By: bushsuxcheney

bushsuxcheney — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:47:34 +0000

Why is it that when it’s already proven with patents and with working models that fee energy goes exist with zero emmission (no pollution of any type) and good for the environment, people are? still digging into mythology to cure the energy and pollution problems as if we’re back in time reinventing the wheel? If you have so much brains, try to simulate Stankey Meyer unless you’re afraid they might kill you too. Then go ahead and fantasize!

By: scyshc

scyshc — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:11:11 +0000

Sunlight,
most of the energy for the battery is? from sunlight

By: maniacalmania

maniacalmania — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:35:51 +0000

It’s more complicated than that. Electromagnetic energy traveling at different frequencies can be represented as any part of a spectrum of forces such as gamma rays, x-rays, microwaves, and even radio waves. The radio waves you are? thinking about are produced at a sustained frequency in order to transmit information. Radio waves are also used for things like MRI (Magnetic Resonant Imaging).

Radio waves exist practically everywhere, even if they aren’t manmade.

For more, wiki electromagnetism.

By: DieterSoegemeier

DieterSoegemeier — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:34:21 +0000

Tesla was converting etheric energy to electricity in 1903 and we are still not allowed to play with his patented invention even today. And even though he proved that it works and that no laws of physics were broken he was forced out of the history books. And now you think what you got is any different than Tesla’s work then think again. Energy is every where all we have to do is convert it. The alternator Tesla invented in 1901? and in use today works well.

By: DieterSoegemeier

DieterSoegemeier — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:14:37 +0000

The Tesla coil works equally well as Tesla showed in 1903 but because the controllers of the planet do not want us to have free electricity Tesla had to go.
I am so looking forward to Dec.2012 because that’s when our combined knowledge finally acknowledges the technology of the past 20,000 years and gets away from the backward thinking controllers of the past 2000 years especially? the last 100 or so.
Long live the fighters.